16 Nov
Security Token News , Regulation

Benefits of tokenisation - Lessons learnt from EtherDelta

Mikko Ohtamaa

The news that the SEC fined EtherDelta founder, Mr. Zack Coburn for running an unlicensed securities exchange has come as no surprise to many in the crypto community. EtherDelta was a former decentralised exchange which ran on the Ethereum blockchain for trading tokens. The SEC has been seen by many in the community as "picking an easy target" before going after larger cryptocurrency and token exchanges.

However, this blog post is not about legal action. Controversially, we see that EtherDelta was accomplishing some of the virtues the SEC itself hopes to pursue in its securities trading regulation. If look we look at EtherDelta beyond the obvious lack of controls, you will see the true potential power of tokenisation and decentralisation.

If you are new to tokens please read my previous article What are Tokens and Securities before diving in here.

    What was EtherDelta

    EtherDelta was founded in the summer of 2016 as Zack's hobby project which he ran alone. He wanted to create a proof of concept on how to build a decentralized exchange on the Ethereum blockchain.

    During the first half of 2016, only a handful of Ethereum tokens existed. When the TokenMarket calendar opened, the listed tokens fit on a single screen. EtherDelta was the only venue to trade these tokens. The price of Ether was $5. Nobody dared to dream about security tokens, ICOs or anything else yet.

    Please note that while I speak about EtherDelta in the past tense, it is still around; run by its new owners, but it is much less significant for the wider token ecosystem nowadays. Zack left the project in late 2017 and EtherDelta had served its role as a pioneer.

    What EtherDelta teaches us about the benefits of tokenisation

    EtherDelta is a perfect example of how tokenisation will disrupt financial instruments and trading.

    Tokenisation brings benefits for both issuers and financial market operators. In this post, we are mainly looking at innovation from the perspective of tokenised markets. I plan to follow up with another post which explores tokenisation benefits for fundraising and corporate governance today.

    Firstly, to put things in perspective: financial markets represent 12% - 19.5% of world economy.


    EtherDelta provided near real-time settlement of your trade. It ran 24 hours a day and was accessible to anyone with an Internet connection. You clicked a buy button and tokens were delivered to your wallet within the next 2 minutes. You got the immediate custodianship of your assets.

    On legacy markets, there is a time difference between striking a deal and the delivery. It is called "T plus X", where T presents the day of the trade and X represents the number of business days it takes to receive your purchase. To cover this latency and slow movement of money, companies need to hold capital in clearing funds.

    The locked capital is never well spent. If the settlement cycle is two days then $3.4 billion is locked up in these funds.


    (NSCC 2010, discussed in DTCC paper)


    Blockchain transactions are hard money, a term popularised by Max Keiser. Hard money means that the transfer of value happens unquestionably and there won't be chargebacks.

    EtherDelta trades with ether and token pairs, both hard money or hard inventory. The trades are settled by a smart contract, ensuring that the trade happens atomically: the full trade happens or none of it happens. There cannot be partial trades or failures to deliver and there is zero counterparty risk.

    Legacy trading is plagued by settlement failures, aptly named as a post-trade risk. Failure to deliver happens when it turns out the prospective buyer was out of money or the seller was out of inventory.

    "The current settlement failure rate of two percent accounts for about $3 billion in losses every year" DTCC executive director Tony Freeman, 2017.


    An SEC press release highlights that "3.6 million transactions in 18 months" happened on EtherDelta. We can put this to a perspective by comparing it with Alternative Investment Markets (AIM), in London. AIM started as a growth company exchange in 1996 and, as of 2017, it was reported that the daily average volume was £3.3 billion.

    EtherDelta reached the same amount of trades in 18 months that AIM had in 2006 after ten years of existence.


    Listing your token on EtherDelta was free. Anyone could bring their token to be traded. There was little to zero vetting processes for listing. It is speculated that this lack of due diligence on issuers, and lack of anti-money laundering controls, prompted the regulator interest.

    You can find over 1000 tokens listed on EtherDelta. This, in comparison is more companies than AIM lists today. Projects all over the world could be on the same line and there was no discrimination in access to markets, for both investors and issuers.

    My god, it's full of tokens (EtherDelta 2018)

    Many of these tokens are not viable in the long term. However, this is equally true for all early ventures. Most small businesses and start ups fail: a risk that never can be eliminated without eliminating the progress itself.

    In our traditional financial world, Main Street investors lack the same access to deals as Wall Street investors. We suffer from the "rich-get-richer phenomenon." Companies do not go public and privileged private equity investor reap the profits. The SEC itself has called for better retail access to deals.

    The SEC is also worried about liquidity for small and medium businesses. Liquidity, ways of getting in and out from your investment, always creates additional investor protection. Currently, any form of trading non-public stock is complicated. An order book, even with limited action, would be better than nothing.


    EtherDelta was "a man and a laptop" operation. The codebase had only a few thousand lines. The required capital to start and run it was basically nil. All you needed to arm yourself with were hardcore programming skills and some knowledge about capital markets.

    EtherDelta was faster, less risky and better performing than most contemporary securities trading venues out there. If a blockchain gives this kind of power to a single developer, we are sitting on the top of a financial cruise missile.

    It is not just about squeezing more efficiency out of existing financial machinery. Without barriers creating new trading avenues, we can expect to see new markets where markets have not existed before. This will help regions like Africa where a vast amount of resources, both human and natural, have been untapped due to a lack of access to markets.

    Where the world will go from here

    Cryptocurrencies and tokens proved that we can have functional investor direct and real-time markets. There is unmet global demand for small-scale investing and trading. Chat rooms and exchanges are filled with people from every corner of the planet to research, discuss and trade tokens. The network effects of public blockchains create vast communities across the borders.

    People who are "into tokens" often lack frictionless access to better financial instruments. Instead of utility tokens, with only speculative economic benefits, we should give them the real deal: stocks and bonds in the form of security tokens. There is no technical reason we cannot do it.

    The security token industry is going to be built from the bottom up. Starting with grass root investing, from startups and community ventures. At the forefront, we will have sectors and regions where significant financial supplements are missing, inefficient or non-existent. A precedent is how developing countries leapfrogged into mobile banking.

    The elephant in the digital chat room is the regulation, but I feel creating public secondary markets for these "small-scale securities" will not be such a massive change. The UK and EU are already comfortable with crowdfunding and platform based retail solicitation. For pioneering jurisdictions, it is a natural step to extend this crowdfunding regulation to cover secondary markets. Even before that happens, we can rely on exemptions which smart legislators have left us.

    Now the race is on - for entrepreneurs and regulators alike. Who will be the first company to write a rulebook for "global small-scale securities exchange"? Who will be the first jurisdiction to approve it? The line behind their homepage will stretch around the world.


    Tweet to TokenMarket for any comments or questions.

    Planning a security token sale?

    TokenMarket has executed more than 30 token sales and raised more than 350M USD for its client. Contact us to see how we can help you with your issuance.

    About the author

    Mikko Ohtamaa

    Mikko Ohtamaa is the CTO of TokenMarket. He has been working with blockchains and tokens since 2013. He has helped to execute several token sales and now focuses on bringing securities on a blockchain.

    LinkedIn Twitter